troy allen berry gregg county judicial records

Georgia, in which the court ruled that capital punishment was a violation of the eighth and fourteenth amendments in respect to the crimes committed. His appeal stood on the claim that the death penalty was in actuality a from of cruel and unusual punishment as a sentence for the crimes he had committed. Georgia was the basis of Troy Gregg’s appeal to the Supreme Court. One of the most significant aspects of Gregg v. This system was established to reduce the risk of any prejudice or capricious sentencing by the jury, thus creating a system allowing for the legal use the death penalty as a sentence. The bifurcated system involves sentencing by an impartial jury and then that sentencing to be vetted by a Georgia Supreme Court Justice to further validate it’s impartiality. Second, the Supreme Court upheld the bifurcated system, a two-part judgement system established by the Georgia legislature as a result of Furman v. First the Supreme Court cites the constitutional provision of the 8 th amendment that prohibits the arbitrary implication of cruel and unusual punishment, this provision however does not stipulate that the least severe means of punishment must be used.

After oral arguments and deliberation, the Supreme Court decided that Troy Gregg’s challenge against his death sentence was groundless. Troy Gregg did so on the grounds that the death penalty is in fact “cruel and unusual” punishment and therefore direct violation of the 8 th and 14 th amendment. Troy Gregg, after being convicted in the lower Georgia Courts and sentenced to death, appealed his case to the Supreme Court.

Georgia, 428 US 153 (1976) was the Supreme Court case which established that the death penalty, as long as it is applied appropriately, is constitutional and does not violate the 8 th and 14 th amendment.

Troy allen berry gregg county judicial records